an online journal jointly published by imcg and ips
About |
Editorial Board |
Volumes |
Book Reviews |
Submit a paper |
Contact |
Copyright |
Home |
by J.T. Mitchell, J. Grace and G.P. Harrison
Published online: 07.05.2010
Summary
The siting of wind farms on natural and afforested upland
peatlands presents an interesting public policy
dilemma. Such locations may offer developers attractive wind
characteristics amidst sparse human
settlement, but the associated disturbance of carbon from soils and
vegetation may reduce the carbon benefits
that can be derived from wind farm operation. To examine the relative
impacts, an estimate was made of the
CO2 payback time for a wind farm hypothetically
sited on an afforested peatland in north-east England
known as Harwood Forest. The location is representative of many
potential wind farm sites, and was chosen
for this study because its carbon fluxes and stores have been
extensively characterised. We adjusted a
published LCA for a wind farm in another location to take account of CO2
that would be emitted or not
sequestered as a result of site disturbance if it were constructed and
operated in Harwood Forest. The results
show that the wind farm would compensate for its life cycle CO2
emissions in less than three years of
operation in Harwood Forest, whereas the CO2
payback time would be reduced to less than five months if it
were placed at an alternative site where CO2
emissions from disturbed soil and vegetation were not an issue.
download paper (260 kB) . download calculator (20 kB)
Mitchell, J.T., Grace, J. & Harrison, G.P. (2010): CO2 payback time for a wind farm on afforested peatland in the UK. Mires and Peat 4: Art. 10. (Online: http://www.mires-and-peat.net/map04/map_04_10.htm)
IMCG and IPS acknowledge the work of the reviewers.
| Last update: 07.05.2010 | ![]() |
www.mires-and-peat.net |
| Key title: Mires and Peat | ISSN 1819-754X | Abbreviated key title: Mires Peat |